🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPharmacology & MechanismsHas anyone dealt with my pharmacist tried to explain the mechanism and my eyes glazed over? Page 2

Has anyone dealt with my pharmacist tried to explain the mechanism and my eyes glazed over?

labquiet_amy Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:14 PM 34 replies 2,580 viewsPage 2 of 7
PedsEndoPhilly
Member
345
1,890
Jun 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 21, 2024 at 6:04 PM#6

So if I'm understanding correctly — the next generation of treatments could include:

  • GLP-1 alone (semaglutide — current)
  • GLP-1 + GIP dual agonist (tirzepatide — current)
  • GLP-1 + amylin dual (CagriSema — coming)
  • GLP-1 + GIP + glucagon triple (retatrutide — coming)

How would a doctor decide which one a patient should be on? Is more pathways always better?

38 3sarah_TO, wendy_avl, jason_paloalto and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
Mar 21, 2024 at 6:21 PM#7

Great question. More pathways isn't always better — it's about matching the right mechanism to the right patient. Here's how I think the treatment landscape will eventually stratify:

  • GLP-1 monotherapy (semaglutide, oral orforglipron): First-line for most patients. Well-characterized, proven CV benefit, available oral options.
  • GLP-1/GIP dual (tirzepatide): For patients needing more weight loss, or with T2D where both GLP-1 and GIP contribute to glucose lowering.
  • GLP-1/amylin (CagriSema): For patients with strong hunger/craving phenotype where dual satiety pathway engagement is beneficial. Possibly better for patients with strong hedonic eating patterns.
  • GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple (retatrutide): For patients with MASH/liver disease, or those needing maximum weight loss (BMI 40+). The glucagon component specifically benefits hepatic fat metabolism.

This is speculative, and we don't have biomarkers to predict response to different mechanisms yet. But precision obesity medicine — matching the drug mechanism to the patient phenotype — is where the field is heading.

46 10KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Mar 21, 2024 at 6:38 PM#8

Well articulated. The REDEFINE program will be a defining data package (pun intended) for CagriSema. REDEFINE-1 topline results are encouraging but we need the full publication with subgroup analyses, body composition data, and metabolic parameters.

For anyone following the field: Novo Nordisk's investor day presentations provide good overviews of the REDEFINE timeline. All Phase 3 trials should report by 2026-2027, with potential FDA approval in 2027-2028 if data are positive. We'll update this thread as publications emerge.

Last edited: Mar 21, 2024 at 8:38 PM
43 2DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

GLP-1R desensitization — β-arrestin-mediated internalization18 replies
Biased agonism at GLP-1R — Gs vs β-arrestin signaling balance13 replies
Semaglutide albumin binding and the C-18 fatty acid linker17 replies
GIP receptor pharmacology — why GIP agonism enhances GLP-113 replies
Glucagon receptor signaling — hepatic glycogenolysis and lipolysis16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register