🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareCost-effectiveness analysis: GLP-1 agonists vs bariatric surgery (ICER 2026) — March 2026 Page 2

Cost-effectiveness analysis: GLP-1 agonists vs bariatric surgery (ICER 2026) — March 2026

Dr.EndoEP Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:14 PM 15 replies 2,066 viewsPage 2 of 3
emily_PDX
Member
245
1,123
Nov 2024
Portland, OR
Mar 7, 2024 at 8:04 PM#6

Saving this for reference. Top-tier content.

49 21julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Mar 7, 2024 at 8:21 PM#7

Slightly tangential to Cost-effectiveness but PedsEndoPhilly reminded me — what is the latest on the oral formulations?

I know it is not exactly on-topic but it seems related enough to ask here rather than starting a new thread. Apologies if this has been covered — I did search first.

Last edited: Mar 7, 2024 at 11:21 PM
46 21laura_annarbor, JenMemphis, pat_auckland and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Mar 7, 2024 at 8:38 PM#8

+1 to PedsEndoPhilly. Especially the point about "A few questions about your Cost-effectiv..." — I have seen the same in my own experience with Cost-effectiveness.

22 24jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
Mar 7, 2024 at 8:55 PM#9

Dr.PathRoch — that is really helpful context on Cost-effectiveness. Follow-up question: how long did you wait before increasing your dose?

I am in a similar situation (week 4) and trying to set realistic expectations.

7 24julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.EndoIndy
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 7, 2024 at 9:12 PM#10

To answer Dr.GutHealth's question specifically:

From a clinical standpoint, Cost-effectiveness analysis is a reasonable concern that deserves a thorough answer.

The short answer: the evidence supports this approach for most patients.

The longer answer involves reviewing the specific clinical trial data relevant to your question, which I am happy to elaborate on if helpful.

Last edited: Mar 8, 2024 at 12:12 AM
38 21SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register